Skip to content 
Evidence Presented in the Documentary
The documentary provides several pieces of evidence to support its claim that Peter Todd is Satoshi Nakamoto. This evidence includes:
- Todd’s Early Involvement in Bitcoin:The documentary highlights Todd’s involvement in the Bitcoin community from its early days. It points to his contributions to Bitcoin forums, his development of Bitcoin-related software, and his participation in Bitcoin conferences as evidence of his early and deep understanding of Bitcoin’s technology and principles.
This early involvement, the documentary argues, is a key indicator of his potential role in Bitcoin’s creation.
- Technical Expertise:The documentary emphasizes Todd’s technical expertise in cryptography and computer science. It showcases his contributions to the Bitcoin Core project, a critical component of Bitcoin’s infrastructure, as evidence of his technical prowess. This expertise, the documentary suggests, aligns with the technical sophistication required to create Bitcoin.
- Alignment with Bitcoin’s Principles:The documentary emphasizes Todd’s outspoken advocacy for Bitcoin’s decentralized nature. It highlights his criticisms of attempts to centralize Bitcoin and his commitment to Bitcoin’s core principles of privacy, security, and decentralization. This alignment with Bitcoin’s philosophical underpinnings, the documentary argues, is a strong indication of his potential role as its creator.
- Circumstantial Evidence:The documentary also presents circumstantial evidence, such as the timing of Todd’s involvement in the Bitcoin community and his early writings on Bitcoin’s technical aspects. These pieces of evidence, while not conclusive on their own, contribute to the overall narrative that the documentary aims to construct.
The strength and validity of the evidence presented in the documentary are subject to debate. While the documentary highlights Todd’s involvement in Bitcoin’s early days, his technical expertise, and his alignment with Bitcoin’s principles, it does not provide definitive proof that he is Satoshi Nakamoto.
The evidence presented is largely circumstantial and relies on interpretations of past events and actions. The documentary’s reliance on circumstantial evidence, rather than conclusive proof, leaves room for skepticism and alternative interpretations.
